OpenAI just lately launched o1 and o1 professional of their 12 Days of OpenAI – Reside updates, providing limitless entry via a $200 ChatGPT Professional subscription. With a lot hypothesis surrounding their capabilities, I puzzled – Is that this premium subscription definitely worth the funding? To reply this, I pitted these two AI fashions towards one another in six difficult duties. This text explores their strengths, weaknesses, and general efficiency. By the tip, you’ll have a transparent understanding of whether or not the $200 ChatGPT Professional subscription is the suitable alternative for you or not!
Problem 1. Fixing a Zebra Downside
As the primary check of o1 vs o1 professional, I’m taking a zebra downside – arduous stage from this web site. Let’s see which one cracks it higher!
Immediate:
Resolve this zebra downside:
o1 Resonse:
Placing this response as the answer, it seems to be incorrect:
o1 professional Response:
Placing this resonse as the answer, it seems to be appropriate:
Commentary:
o1 professional took far more time than o1 to reply. o1 fails to unravel the issue, whereas o1 professional succeds!
Verdict:
o1 ❌ | o1 professional ✅
Problem 2: Discover Distinction
Immediate:
Discover 3 variations within the two pictures:
o1 Response:
- Merchandise in hand: Within the left picture, she’s holding a spoon. In the suitable picture, she’s holding an ice cream cone as a substitute.
- Hair accent: Within the left picture, her hair is obvious. In the suitable picture, she is carrying a small pink bow in her hair.
- Background object: Within the left picture, there’s a inexperienced stitching machine on the shelf behind her. In the suitable picture, the stitching machine is changed by a easy inexperienced field (or body).
Commentary:
Solely the second distinction is appropriate which is the hair accent lacking, relaxation 2 are incorrect.
o1 professional Response:
- The woman’s coiffure accent: In the suitable picture, she has a pink bow in her hair, which isn’t current within the left picture.
- What she’s holding in her hand: Within the left picture, she’s holding a spoon. In the suitable picture, she’s holding an ice cream cone as a substitute.
- The colour of the center scoop within the ice cream bowl: Within the left picture, the center scoop is pink, whereas in the suitable picture, that scoop has turned white.
Commentary:
Solely the primary distinction is appropriate. Relaxation 2 are incorrect.
Each o1 and o1 professional weren’t capable of reply correctlty. Nevertheless, o1 was sooner in producing the response.
Verdict:
o1 ❌ | o1 professional ❌
Problem 3: Resolve a Math Downside
On this problem, I will likely be giving a computing Indefinite Integrals downside to the fashions. Let’s see which one is ready to resolve it!
Immediate:
Resolve this math downside:
o1 and o1 professional Response (Similar):
Commentary:
Each the fashions offered the right reply however the o1 was a lot sooner than o1 professional find the answer.
Verdict:
o1 ✅ | o1 professional ✅
Problem 4: Analyzing Article
Immediate:
Learn the article – https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/weblog/2024/07/building-agentic-rag-systems-with-langgraph/ to grasp the method of constructing a vector database for Wikipedia knowledge. Summarize the important thing steps in a concise method.
o1 Response:
o1 Professional Response:
Commentary:
The “o1 professional response” is nearer to the precise implementation within the article. Right here’s why:
The article supplies a way more detailed, step-by-step implementation involving:
- Utilizing particular libraries like LangChain and OpenAI embeddings
- Loading Wikipedia knowledge from a particular archive
- Utilizing Chroma because the vector database
- Implementing superior RAG elements like:
- Question rephrasing
- Doc relevance grading
- Internet search integration
- A fancy LangGraph workflow
The o1 professional response captures extra nuance by mentioning:
- Particular embedding fashions (sentence-transformers)
- Vector database choices
- Metadata storage
- Testing retrieval
- Integration with a RAG pipeline
In contrast, the preliminary “o1 response” is extra generic and lacks the technical depth demonstrated within the article. So the o1 professional response is considerably nearer to the article’s precise implementation, although nonetheless a simplified model of the excellent method detailed within the full article.
Verdict:
o1 ❌ | o1 professional ✅
Problem 5: Picture Creation
Immediate:
Create a picture of a cat.
o1 Response:
o 1 professional Response:
Commentary:
Each o1 and o1 professional weren’t capable of generated pictures indicating each the o1 variations don’t assist picture era. Nevertheless, on giving the identical immediate to GPT 4o, I acquired the response:
Therefore, it’s secure to say that solely GPT 4o is thrashing each o1 and o1 professional in picture era!
Verdict:
o1 ❌ | o1 professional ❌
Problem 6: Making a Logical Circulation Chart
Immediate:
Create a complete stream chart illustrating the Reflection Sample in Agentic AI.
o1 Response:
o1 Professional:
Each offered incomplete stream chats, so I made a decision to replace my immediate. Right here’s my up to date immediate:
New Immediate:
These are the steps concerned in reflection patter –
- Generate Preliminary Output
- Self-Evaluation/Critique the Output
- Determine Errors, Gaps, or Enchancment Areas
- Develop Enchancment Recommendations
- Revise/Refine the Output
- Repeat Steps 2-5 Till Passable Result’s Achieved
- Create a brand new stream chart now
o1 Response:
o1 professional Response:
Commentary:
Regardless that the content material in each the responses is similar, o1 is definetly profitable by offering an precise stream chart, whereas o1 professional solely offered the right content material.
Verdict:
o1 ✅ | o1 professional ❌
Outcome Chart: o1 vs o1 professional
| Problem | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Zebra Downside | o1 professional succeeded, however was slower |
| Discover Variations | Each fashions carried out poorly |
| Math Downside | Each solved appropriately, o1 was sooner |
| Analyzing Article | o1 professional offered extra depth |
| Picture Creation | Neither may generate pictures (GPT 4o may) |
| Making a Logical Circulation Chart | o1 received by creating an precise stream chart |
o1 professional appears to have a slight edge when it comes to problem-solving depth and accuracy, notably in complicated duties like fixing the zebra downside and analyzing technical articles. Nevertheless, o1 tends to be sooner and performs nicely in less complicated duties.The decision seems to be that o1 Professional is marginally higher, particularly for extra complicated or technical challenges that require deeper understanding.
Additionally Learn: Is the New o1 Mannequin Higher than GPT-4o?
Finish Notice
Whereas o1 professional exhibits promise in complicated problem-solving, it’s essential to contemplate your particular wants and price range. For fundamental to intermediate duties, GPT-4o or different extra reasonably priced alternate options would possibly suffice. On condition that OpenAI is regularly refining these fashions, it is likely to be sensible to attend for additional updates earlier than making a definitive determination. If complicated problem-solving is a precedence and also you’re keen to take a position, o1 professional could possibly be a worthwhile device.
What are your ideas on this? Let me know within the remark part under.
Keep tuned to Analytics Vidhya Weblog for extra such superior updates!
Hey, I’m Nitika, a tech-savvy Content material Creator and Marketer. Creativity and studying new issues come naturally to me. I’ve experience in creating result-driven content material methods. I’m nicely versed in website positioning Administration, Key phrase Operations, Internet Content material Writing, Communication, Content material Technique, Enhancing, and Writing.
