The Galaxy S25 is one more product from the Korean tech big that has entry to some options from Google that different telephones do not but have. It is not the primary time this has occurred; we have seen it in earlier Galaxy cellphone launches, and even the “new” Put on OS appears utterly like a Samsung/Google joint effort. The partnership between the 2 has by no means been stronger.
I’ve seen just a few individuals declare that that is ruining Android. I disagree and assume, if something, that is much less of a partnership and extra like Google exploiting Samsung as a result of Samsung permits it.
Android & Chill
One of many internet’s longest-running tech columns, Android & Chill is your Saturday dialogue of Android, Google, and all issues tech.
I am not speaking about any type of web slap-fighting between overzealous however misguided model loyalists. Samsung did not promote unhealthy shows to different firms or purposely promote exploding batteries to smash the popularity of the Android ecosystem. Frankly, that sort of pondering reveals an individual has no concept how the smartphone trade even works, and I steer clear of all of it. OnePlus bought thousands and thousands of telephones and a handful of them utilizing Samsung shows had a inexperienced line. Samsung bought thousands and thousands of Notice 7s, and 10 or so had important battery points, prompting a recall. Nothing was intentional.
What I am speaking about and the place a lot of the dialogue about Android’s ruined popularity stems from how carefully the 2 firms appear to work collectively to offer Samsung first entry, and even unique entry, to Google options.
This can be a change to how Android began. Having one firm in a position to get Google software program when different firms cannot is a slap within the face of Android’s “open” days. There was a time when Motorola and HTC had been atop the Android mountain and Samsung would have been displeased if Google gave both unique entry to options. Rightly so, thus I understand that to some individuals this variation has ruined Android.
The factor is that Android was by no means actually open and this is not Samsung’s doing. Blame Google if you should level the finger.
The Google/Samsung relationship is not equal, and that’s Samsung’s fault. Samsung will depend on Google for the software program that powers most of its cellular merchandise and has given up attempting to alter that. Gadgets that ran Bada and Tizen weren’t good and had depressing gross sales numbers in comparison with any of Samsung’s newer Android-powered gadgets. They had been Samsung’s personal, although, and I want energetic improvement and merchandise utilizing them had been nonetheless round. Competitors is nice, ya know?
Google appears to contemplate Samsung its personal private advertising and marketing division and product showcase division to me. Google did not permit Samsung to have so many Pixel-esque AI options on the S25 as a result of it needed to assist Samsung. It does it as a result of it is aware of Samsung can promote a whole lot of thousands and thousands of telephones yearly, and it desires individuals to have entry to those options so it may well gather extra knowledge. So long as Google stays in management, it would not care that folks assume Gemini is a Samsung product. It cares that extra persons are utilizing it.
Google does this by having two completely different Androids. There may be the Android Open Supply Venture that you simply or I can obtain and use on no matter system we like, making any adjustments we wish so long as the open-source licenses are honored. Then there’s the locked-down model of precise Android (sure, the identify itself is trademarked) that Google controls with a good grip. Licensing and platform entry agreements imply if your organization desires to promote a cellphone operating Android with entry to any of Google’s software program, you’ll toe their line.
That is the Android that Google makes use of like a carrot on a stick for system producers. What Google does right here is extraordinarily distasteful to me, however it means firms like Samsung or OnePlus do not need to develop their very own equal. Though they in all probability may. If Amazon can do it, Samsung can do it.
Samsung has grown depending on Google. Some fragments present what Samsung may do, like Good Lock. It appears probably Google forces Samsung to forestall the mixing of Good Lock into OneUI, saying it will create some software program fork, and which means you must go to the Galaxy Retailer and set up it like an app.
Merely put, for those who imagine that Google and Samsung are working collectively to create exclusivity, you are in all probability proper. It is a change from the Android of yesteryear, and also you may assume it is ruining issues — some individuals dislike change.
Do not blame Samsung for it as a result of it is 100% Google’s doing.
