data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06ab5/06ab5cb39d3f79030740a1773bd97009977e01bc" alt="google pixel 8 pro video boost google photos interface google pixel 8 pro video boost google photos interface"
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
The finest digital camera telephones proceed to innovate lately on the subject of cool digital camera choices and capabilities. Options like Google’s Greatest Take, object/shadow/reflection removing, and photographic types/shade profiles have all made an affect in the previous couple of generations.
Nonetheless, many smartphone makers are more and more turning to the cloud to energy new digital camera capabilities, and I completely hate this pattern. Let me inform you why.
A rising pattern that should cease
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e974f/e974f16493f36648c78c1210aca23caa627b70b0" alt="OnePlus 13 ai editing tools OnePlus 13 ai editing tools"
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
Within the final 24 months or so, we’ve seen a number of manufacturers adopting cloud-based digital camera options. Maybe the most effective instance is Google’s Pixel 8 Professional and Pixel 9 Professional telephones providing Video Increase for low-light video and 8K decision, counting on its servers to energy this functionality. I’ve additionally been utilizing the vivo X200 Professional, so think about my disappointment when it turned out that modifying instruments like photobombing removing, glare discount, and AI Picture Enhancer all required an web connection.
One other outstanding instance is the OnePlus 13, which gives an AI Eraser, reflection removing, and AI Unblur performance. Sadly, my colleague Ryan Haines confirmed that each one of those options are powered by the cloud. What’s the purpose of corporations bragging about AI on their telephones when all these options require an web connection?
Do you care that some telephone digital camera options require the cloud?
271 votes
The newest instance is the HONOR Magic 7 Professional. The telephone has a cloud-based AI telephoto enhancement possibility that kicks in after 30x to “enhance” zoom high quality. I can possibly forgive HONOR for the web connection requirement if the ensuing photographs regarded good, however they often seem like dangerous AI slop. In truth, I’d say it’s one of many worst makes use of of AI for images from a serious Android model thus far, topping the “AI modes” of yore that merely oversaturated photographs. Why does the tree within the AI picture under have additional branches? The AI image is weirder the longer you have a look at it.
Why do I hate the cloud requirement for digital camera options?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32efa/32efaad1418b079095a096f9cc2ab244538844ff" alt="Video Boost onboarding Video Boost onboarding"
Damien Wilde / Android Authority
There are a number of the reason why I’ve a deep disdain for many of those cloud-based digital camera capabilities. Maybe a very powerful one for most individuals is that there are privateness and safety considerations. I don’t need to give my pictures and movies to smartphone corporations, even when they’ve good intentions. No matter their information retention claims, I don’t need to run the danger of my pictures and movies being leaked or mishandled. We already see our non-public particulars mishandled by different corporations and even authorities, so there’s each probability the identical may apply to smartphone makers.
Personally, my greatest challenge with cloud-based digital camera performance is the necessity for an web connection within the first place. Sure, I’m related to Wi-Fi more often than not and often have moderately quick mobile protection once I’m out and about. However I’m up poop creek and not using a paddle if I need to use these options when in a distant space or whereas on a flight.
Cloud-based digital camera options are a privateness and safety threat, whereas additionally being inconvenient in a number of conditions.
It is a large downside for the Pixel’s Video Increase function, which might require a number of gigabytes of bandwidth. So that you’re out of luck in case you have a small information cap or a sluggish connection. The previous is one thing I nonetheless have to fret about when away from residence given my pay as you go cellular information plan. Even in case you have a quick web connection and uncapped bandwidth, you’ll nonetheless have to attend a number of hours for the video to be processed by Google’s servers. These challenges could possibly be addressed by providing low-light video and 8K video seize on-device. You understand, like everybody else is doing. Certain, Google’s servers would possibly provide higher-quality outcomes than a neighborhood answer, however I’d wager that many individuals would commerce some high quality for the comfort of an on-device strategy.
Extra digital camera options that don’t want the cloud, please
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6660a/6660ab5a14f07223b4bb663dcbc7224fbb4667d6" alt="Google Photos Audio Magic Eraser Google Photos Audio Magic Eraser"
I’m additionally glad to see on-device digital camera options from different manufacturers, resembling Samsung’s Single Take, Xiaomi’s AI Zoom, and 4K/120fps slow-mo and evening video seize from varied manufacturers. All of it reveals that you simply don’t want the cloud to create cool digital camera instruments, particularly with current Snapdragon and Dimensity chips making main strides by way of imaging and AI capabilities.
That’s to not say I’m fully against cloud-enabled digital camera options, however I hope corporations assume twice about utilizing the cloud for a lot of digital camera and normal AI capabilities (e.g. transcriptions and summaries) sooner or later.Â