8 C
United States of America
Monday, February 3, 2025

Enhanced tumor self-targeting of lemon-derived extracellular vesicles by embedding homotypic most cancers cell membranes for environment friendly drug supply | Journal of Nanobiotechnology


Lemons have been bought from Sichuan, China. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX•HCl, D107159) was bought from Aladdin Industrial Company (Shanghai, China). Sucrose was bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Anti-CD47 antibody, anti-CD44 antibody, and anti-E-CAD antibody have been bought from BioLegend (California, USA). DMEM, RPMI-1640 cell tradition medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 0.25% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) have been bought from Gibco (Massachusetts, USA). The membrane protein extraction equipment, the BCA protein quantification assay equipment (P0010S), Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), Enhanced ATP assay equipment (S0027), 1,1’-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-Tetramethylindodicarbocyanine, 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate salt (DiD), 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI), 3,3′-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate (DiO), Calcein-AM, propidium iodide (PI), DAPI dihydrochloride (DAPI), and Cy5 have been obtained from Beyotime Biotech. Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD, M812850), chlorpromazine hydrochloride (CPZ, C834105), and amiloride hydrochloride (A832892) have been bought from Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China).

Cell strains

4T1 (mouse breast most cancers cell line), CT26 (mouse colon most cancers cell line), and MCF-10 A (human regular breast epithelial cell line) have been offered by the Cell Financial institution of the Chinese language Academy of Sciences. 4T1 cell was cultured by Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) in a 37 °C humidified chamber with 5% CO2. CT26 cell was cultured by RPMI 1640 in a 37 °C humidified chamber with 5% CO2. MCF-10 A cell was cultured by MCF-10 A cell-specific medium in a 37 °C humidified chamber with 5% CO2.

Mice

Feminine BALB/c mice (4–6 weeks) have been bought from (Beijing Very important River Laboratory Animal Expertise Co. Ltd.,China). All animal experiments have been accredited in accordance with present pointers for the care of laboratory animals and have been accredited by the suitable committees of Hubei College of Chinese language Drugs. (approval ID: SYXK-2023-0067).

Preparation and characterization of LEVs

The lemons have been damaged by way of a wall breaker after cleansing and peeling. The obtained juice was centrifuged at 3000 g (50 min) by refrigerated centrifuge (Labogene 1730R, Labogene), after which the supernatant was centrifuged at 20,000 g (90 min). The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 150,000 g (90 min) by ultracentrifuge (OptimaXE-100, Beckman), and the pellet was re-suspended in 1 mL of Phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The above answer was added to a sucrose focus gradient answer (15%, 30%, 45%, and 60% sucrose in 20 mM Tris HCl, pH = 7.2), and centrifuged at 150,000 g for 90 min. 30% and 45% bands have been centrifuged at 150,000 g for 90 min, and the precipitation was collected and used for subsequent experiments. The focus of LEVs was decided by the BCA protein quantitative assay equipment. The dimensions distribution and zeta potential of PDVs have been measured by zetasizer nano (S90, Malvern). The floor morphology of PDVs was decided by organic transmission electron microscope (TEM, HT7700, Hitachi).

Preparation of 4T1 cell membrane fragments

4T1 cell was collected by centrifugation at 1500 g for five min. 1 mL protein extraction answer (PMSF was added earlier than use, the ultimate focus is 1 mM) was added to the collected cells, and positioned on ice for 10 min, throughout which period the cells have been vortexed vigorously 2–3 instances. The combination was homogenized manually up and down 30–50 instances utilizing a glass homogenizer. The combination was centrifuged at 4 °C (700 g, 10 min), and the supernatant was additional centrifuged (14,000 g, 30 min). 4T1 cell membranes have been collected, freeze-dried, and put aside to be used. The combination was floor and centrifuged at 4 °C (700 g, 10 min), and the supernatant was additional centrifuged (14,000 g, 30 min). The 4T1 cell membranes have been collected, freeze-dried, and put aside to be used.

Preparation and characterization of LEVB

LEVBD was ready by mixing LEVs, 4T1 cell membrane, and DOX and sonicated for 1 h at 4 °C. A FRET (fluorescence resonance vitality switch) pair composed of DiI and DiD was used to confirm the profitable fusion of LEVs and 4T1 membranes. LEVs have been stained with DiD (excitation/emission = 644/663 nm) and DiI (excitation/emission = 549/565 nm), after which the 4T1 membrane and the dyed-LEVs with completely different weight ratios, together with 5:1, 4:1, 3: 1, 2:1, and 1:1, have been mixed by sonicate at 4 °C for 60 min. The fluorescence spectrum of every pattern was learn between 550 and 850 nm with an excitation wavelength of 525 nm. Fluorescence restoration of the donor (DiI) was used to observe the rise in fusion. As well as, DiO-labeled LEVs and DiD-labeled 4T1 movies have been blended at a mass ratio of 1:1, and confocal microscopy pictures of the combination have been obtained by inverted fluorescence microscope (I-FLM, Ti-2, Nikon) after sonication (4 °C, 6 min).

Western blot evaluation

Western blotting (WB) was used to detect the expression of 4T1 cells marker protein, CD47, CD44, and E-CAR proteins in LEVB. Proteins have been separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electropheresis (SDS-PAGE), and samples have been transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking the membrane in 5% skim milk for 50 min and washing twice with PBS, the membrane was incubated in a single day with the next major antibodies: anti-CD47, anti-CD44, and anti-E-CAD. After the membrane was incubated with HRP-labeled secondary antibody for 30 min, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) was used to detect the presence of the goal proteins on the membrane.

DOX loading and launch in vitro

1 mL of 20 µg/mL DOX and 20 µg LEVB have been constantly sonicated for 60 min, and the free DOX within the combination was eliminated with an ultrafiltration tube (2 mL, 100 kDa) to acquire LEVBD. The DOX loading effectivity was calculated by measuring the optical density (OD) worth of DOX on the absorption peak (483 nm) utilizing UV spectrophotometry.

$$:textual content{L}textual content{o}textual content{a}textual content{d}textual content{i}textual content{n}textual content{g}:textual content{e}textual content{f}textual content{f}textual content{i}textual content{c}textual content{i}textual content{e}textual content{n}textual content{c}textual content{y}:left(textual content{%}proper):=:({textual content{O}textual content{D}}_{textual content{T}}-{textual content{O}textual content{D}}_{textual content{F}textual content{r}}/{textual content{O}textual content{D}}_{textual content{T}}):instances:100text{%}$$

the place ODT is the whole OD worth of DOX for drug loading, ODFr is the OD worth of unencapsulated DOX. To review the discharge price of DOX in numerous pH environments, LEVBD was dispersed in a dialysis bag containing 1 mL of PBS, and the dialysis bag was added to buffers with pH = 5.5, 6.5, and seven.4. 0.2 mL of buffer answer was taken out at predetermined time factors for absorbance measurement.

Mobile uptake investigation

Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, FV3000, Olympus) was used to detect mobile uptake as a perform of focus and time. 4T1 cells have been seeded in confocal dish (dd: 15 mm) at a density of two × 104 cells/mL and cultured for 12 h. The medium was changed with serum-free DMEM containing completely different concentrations of LEVBD, and the cells have been cultured for two, 6, and 12 h, respectively. The cells within the tradition plate have been washed thrice with PBS, fastened with 4% paraformaldehyde, and noticed underneath CLSM.

Mobile uptake pathways have been explored by stream cytometer (BD Accuri C6, BD) and I-FLM. The focus of inhibitors was: 15 µM clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibitor chlorpromazine (CPZ), 500 µM caveolin-mediated endocytosis inhibitor methyl-β-cyclo Dextrin (MβCD), and 200 µM macropinocytosis inhibitor amiloride). Then, 4T1 cells have been seeded in 6-well tradition slides at a density of two × 104 cells/mL and cultured for 12 h. The medium was changed with serum-free DMEM containing inhibitors, and the cells have been cultured one other for 4 h. The medium was changed with serum-free DMEM containing 2.5 µg/mL LEVBD (If no particular directions are given, the focus of LEVBD is expressed as DOX focus), and the cells have been cultured for 4 h. The cells have been washed with PBS a minimum of thrice for fluorescence imaging and picked up for cytometric evaluation.

Antitumor efficiency of LEVBD in vitro

4T1 cells have been seeded right into a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per properly and cultured at 37 °C for 12 h. The medium was changed with recent serum-free medium containing completely different concentrations of LEVBD, and the cells have been incubated for 20 h. 10 µL of CCK-8 answer was added to every properly, and the cells have been incubated for two h. The absorbance of every properly was measured with a microplate reader at 450 nm. Calcein-AM/PI was used to review the anti-tumor capacity of LEVBD in vitro. 4T1 cells have been seeded in confocal tradition dishes (dd: 15 mm) and incubated with LEVBD for two h. The cells have been stained with Calcein-AM/PI, and the fluorescence indicators in cells was noticed by inverted fluorescence microscopy and analyzed by stream cytometry.

Particular concentrating on of LEVBD in vitro

Mouse colorectal carcinoma cells (CT26 cells) and 4T1 cells have been seeded into confocal tradition dishes at a density of 1 × 104 cells per dish and cultured at 37 °C for 12 h, respectively. The medium was changed with serum-free DMEM medium containing 2.5 µg/mL LEVBD, and the cells have been cultured for two h. The cells have been washed with PBS and stained with DAPI for 20 min. Then, the cells have been washed thrice with PBS, fastened with 4% paraformaldehyde, and noticed underneath a CLSM. Moreover, stream cytometry was additionally used to review the tumor concentrating on of LEVBD in vitro. 4T1 cell and CT26 cell have been seeded in 6-well plates and incubated with LEVB and LEVBD for two h, respectively. The cells have been collected and analyzed by stream cytometry in numerous teams.

Biodistribution of LEVBD in vivo

4T1 tumor-bearing mice have been obtained by injecting 4T1 cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) subcutaneously into feminine BALB/c mice. The Cy5 probe was used as a tracer to label LEVBD (1 mM Cy5 was dissolved in DMSO and 800 µL of 240 µg/mL LEVBD answer was blended with ultrasound at 4 °C for 1 h. The response combination was stirred away from gentle in a single day at RT.) to observe the supply and distribution in vivo. When the tumor quantity reached 60–90 mm3, the mice have been intravenously injected with 200 µL of Cy5-LEVBD (1.2 mg/kg). Fluorescence pictures of mice have been captured at preset time factors (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h) by a small animal in vivo imaging system (IVIS Lumina III, PerkinElmer). To additional confirm the tumor self-targeting impact of LEVBD on the self-recognition of homotype most cancers cells, we established one other tumor concurrently carrying two various kinds of tumors (CT26 tumor on the left hind limb and 4T1 tumor on the suitable hind limb). The next operations have been the identical as above.

Antitumor results of LEVBD in vivo

All animals have been acclimated to the animal amenities a minimum of one week earlier than experimental procedures. Tumor-bearing mouse fashions have been established by subcutaneous injection of 4T1 cells and CT26 cells (1 × 106 cells/mL). When the tumor quantity is about 60–90 mm3, the mice have been randomly divided into 5 teams (n = 5), together with PBS, DOX, LEVs, LEVBD handled 4T1 tumor, and LEVBD handled CT26 tumor teams. On the identical time, the tumor quantity and physique weight modifications of the mice have been recorded each 2 days after completely different therapies, and the tumor quantity was calculated by the next method V = W2 × L/2, the place W and L have been the width and size of the tumors, respectively. The expansion standing of the mice was photographed, and the survival standing of mice was recorded. Tumors from every group have been collected and weighed after 18 days of remedy.

Security evaluation of LEVBD in vitro and in vivo

MCF-10 A cells have been seeded right into a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per properly and cultured at 37 °C for 12 h. The medium was changed with recent free-serum medium containing LEVB, and the cells have been incubated for twenty-four h. 10 µL of CCK-8 answer have been added into every properly, and the cells have been incubated for two h. The absorbance worth of every properly at 450 nm was measured utilizing a microplate reader.

The wholesome mice have been injected intravenously with PBS and LEVBD, respectively (n = 5). Mice have been injected as soon as on days 1, 3, and seven, respectively, and the tumors and foremost organs have been excised after 14 days, washed twice with PBS, fastened with tissue fixative fluid, and embedded in paraffin blocks to organize sections. All samples have been noticed with an optical microscope.

Half-life and distribution of LEVBD in vivo

LEVBD was injected into mice by way of the tail vein. Blood was collected from the orbital venous plexus at 15, 30, 120, 240, 360, 720 and 1440 min after injection and centrifuged (3000 rpm, 10 min) to acquire plasma samples. Then, the animals have been sacrificed. Add 2 mL IPA·HCl (isopropyl alcohol: 75 mM hydrochloric acid = 9:1, v/v) to plasma (20 µL), and vortex in a single day in the dead of night to precipitate the protein. Then, the pattern was centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min), the supernatant was collected, and transferred to a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F4600, HITACHI, Japan) to measure the DOX fluorescence content material.

Statistical evaluation

Statistical analyses have been performed and the outcomes have been offered as imply ± normal deviation. ANOVA check was utilized to find out statistical significance between two or extra teams, respectively. The importance of distinction was indicated as (ns: no significance, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001).

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles